There is only one way to tell this story and that is to start with a sense of disarray, for journeys of the internal type are never organized. The human mind is far too complex for us to organize it, and often, to even acknowledge it. There is a reason why behaviorist psychologists Watson and Skinner thought it better to call it science when we choose not to study the mind at all. Perhaps following the wisdom of these men, but only less so for I have not had the rigor to look at pig slayings methodically for 365 days, I shall endeavor to tell the story of a journey which looked to go straight into the essence of my mind, with naïve allusions to scientific specificity and philosophical awareness.
While I can say much to explain the circumstances that triggered my inquiry to go this far, I would like to start rather by going straight into the moment that brought me to write this story at all. This moment is the center from which the story’s past, its present and future (which remains unknown to me) can begin to make sense to readers and to myself.
It was one night at the age of 18, at a time when I was breaking from an insecure, naïve, shy and moody teenager into becoming an arrogant, stubbornly confident and aggressive pseudo-intellectual, when my friend got fed up with my ceaseless inquiries for depth and meaning, and harshly showed me the mirror of my condescending arrogance.
It is at this moment, as I was breaking out of my shell to discover that none of my close friends wanted me to be fully myself that I first began to feel lonely and disconnected in a way I was sure no other teenager was feeling. But in all dramatic glory, I not only attributed these feelings to myself, but I also connected them to my inquiries about the absolute nature of concepts like justice, truth, harmony, goodness, beauty and love.
The first philosophical connections that I had received in untrained readings of Plato in Philosophy 101 had already given me a sense that the mystery of life was about something bigger than the minutia to which we are confronted with in the every-day life of a postmodern citizen.
In looking at the difference between universal and particular concepts, I made no balanced judgment and gave no credence to the details of the exterior world, but went straight for the glorious certainty offered by general statements which linked me to a depth of mystery that felt more profound and real than what the world was showing me through my external senses.
That night, disturbed and isolated, I walked down from my friend’s West Los Angeles apartment, feeling dismissed and unloved, and walked calmly to my car to take me through a parking lot journey of self-pity and dissatisfaction for being who I was. After both, hitting the wheel in anger, and cuddling it in search for love, I began to question more deeply the reason for my friend’s reaction to what I felt were my most honest inquiries.
I understood that the fire inside was driven by a deep childhood religious upbringing and memories of an introverted only-child thinker who received enough love to take his position for granted. I knew them to come from a good loving place and felt genuine in my belief that these general questions about the nature of concepts was more important than anything else that my world and reality was offering.
Only I could not understand why this made me a bad person. All I was trying to do was dig through the questions that could enlighten mankind once and for all. Having calmed my ego into a wondrous journey, the kind that trances in thoughts beyond its current environments and into images long thought lost, I pictured a loving old man in a dying bed, with wrinkles that enhanced and not deterred his beauty. He was smiling, satisfied from his long years of work, and as I went inside his memory, I saw a beautiful, serene morning and a younger version of the old man, peacefully sweeping the streets. His heart spoke of gladness and as people passed around him, he was able to reflect the kindness of his heart which in turn got reflected back to him from his fellow street companions.
The neighborhood appointed to him by the City was full of investment bankers, doctors and other members of the capitalist bourgeoisie, but none of their standards of success seemed to fall onto him when they passed him by day by day. This man embodied the Platonic ideal of goodness, and he did not need material or intellectual prowess to be accepted into this community.
Back on my car, I did not know if this man existed but I did know that his ideal was not just a utopian belief, but an actual possibility of the human individual. I was recalling his essence from previous moments where I had been in touch with poor, but honest and happy men and women during my childhood in a third world country. It is then when I realized what made this men happy, and as I thought to myself the words to explain it more precisely, I decided to write them for ‘life is about feeling good and if you see this you will not feel inferior.’ Immediately, tears came running down my cheeks and a moment of reflection took me over as I stared at the small piece of white paper I had just written on.
I felt my world had just shifted into a realization of universal proportions. First, I was already exploring with the thought of me as a writer, and I had always had great aspiration for artists that made me think of them as mystics who had direct connection with the wonders of Existence. Only then did I realize that I had just written a sentence which came profoundly from my heart, and it was in this sentence that I recognized myself as a writer capable of bringing out such deep feelings from the core of his inner being and putting them back into our more tangible reality, into simple pen and paper.
But more importantly, I had connected into a reality that was explicitly unknown to me but subconsciously had always been there. It was as if I had suddenly realized that I was staring at color when all this time I had simply described it as white. There were shades, layers and tones to untangle. The world had become vibrant and exciting in another dimension, one that was capable of speaking back to me through my ceaseless questioning. I no longer had to rely on peers or family to appease the burning of my heart and the logic of my questions. Now all I had to do was reach inside and discover a world that was bigger than me. I decided to start driving back.
The night was especially dark, but my thoughts were not fixated on the cars on the road or the street signs leading me home. My auto-pilot had taken over and I was once again lost in thought. It was not the exciting sputter that creates new ongoing layers of thought that form new ideas and sentences that can be turned into a book. Rather, it was a slow, mellow and contemplative vibe that was dark and mysterious but did not need to be inquired about. You could say it was complete acceptance of goodness as a Platonic ideal and submission to goodness and all that it entails without bothering to figure out how you can determine its existence.
A couple of minutes before getting home, my car’s interior became more luminous, and a light from within seemed to fall from above my head and reflected itself all around my body. Then, from out of my mind, an internal being presented himself as Being itself. My thoughts were on God, whom I had not thought about feeling as real since my very early teenage years, and in that road, I felt a Presence. Goodness was not just an isolated attribute in a transcendental dimension but a piece of God´s totality and a testament of His existence. Tears started to trickle down again and a shiver down my spine informed me that my life was now turning into a new chapter.

One of the first things with which I connected, is at the beginning of the Mass, when the Priest confesses his own sins in the Confiteor. Not only does he recite it, but throughout the prayer, you can also see him bowing before the Altar and slowly moving left and right as he confesses his sins. After he finishes this prayer, the Servers pray for him beginning with, ‘May almighty God have mercy upon thee’ …
Everywhere in the Missal as it goes through the Mass one can see there are little Crosses indicating that at the moment a certain phrase is said by the Priest, one is to do the Sign of the Cross. It requires me to be alert for them, not mechanistically, but following the words (I don’t even have to know their meaning in English, just the Latin will do!) and I have come to realize that a majority of them are said around a particular time when the name of the Lord has been mentioned in a special way.
I long to express something vast, big and magnificent. I have always longed to express what is true, the highest and most magnificent reality which we can think of. This longing is like a burning and unquenchable desire which I cannot stop or dry down or die out. And neither would I want to, for the longing is so strong and feels so right – guiding me slowly towards a deeper path, which becomes less and less afraid of new doors, even though it does become more and more afraid of God, and of offending Him. For who is God, and how can one being a mere human, possibly define Him?
But my longing keeps me thinking: Who is God? Everything. God is everything, but not everything is God – God is only one – the ONLY Being who just IS, is EVERYTHING, not everything individually, but everything at once. How can one know this is true, and not a mere syllogism – or a rational, abstract logic with no practical merit? Because Truth is grounded not only in Reason but also in Faith – both intertwined in utter perfection as the only possibility of perfection itself. It is both an entirely rational process capable of systematic discovery and a slow awakening of the good heart.